Monday, June 14, 2010

What's in a Name?

The other day I managed to get dragged into a heated debate about women taking their husband's last name when they get married. I'll just say it flat out, I want my wife to take my last name. End of the story.

Here are a few reasons why:

God made Eve from Adam, they were joined together to be one flesh. (Genesis 2:22-24)

22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib [j] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
 23 The man said,
       "This is now bone of my bones
       and flesh of my flesh;
       she shall be called 'woman,'
       for she was taken out of man."

 24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.(NIV)

Now if my wife and I were to have separate last names that certainly does not say one flesh. That says 2 individuals.  At weddings you light the 3rd candle and blow out the individual candles signifying bride and groom as individuals.  Some traditions have bride and groom pouring 2 separate vases into a larger vase to signify the new union. Then there's the 3 strand rope intertwined to signify the new relationship between husband, wife, and God. No matter what your custom is these all signify the end of the individual and the beginning of the new union with God.  So to me, not changing your name signifies a person is not totally committed.

Furthermore, name changes in the Bible mark the beginning of new paths in life just as marriage does. For example when Jesus invited Levi to get down with the Home team, he became Matthew. When Saul got down with the Home team he became Paul. When God told Abram his plans for him to become father of many nations he changed his name to Abraham. The same thing happened with his wife Sarai, she became Sarah the mother of many nations. Of course in Biblical times they didn't have last names. Most people were Such and so from some place (ie Jesus of Nazareth,). Or Such and So son of SuchandSo like James the son of Zebedee, which is not the same James as James son of Alphaeus (who may or not be Jesus' brother depending on who you ask). But nonetheless name changes mark new beginnings.

Paul talks about man and wife being equally yoked. Which means having very similar spiritual views and beliefs about religious doctrines. Paul also talks about husband and wife submitting to each other. In case you missed it, check out my post on submission . I plan on having a Christian marriage because I'm a Christian and my faith is very important to me.  But let's exam this from a secular lens.  After all, what good is faith if it can't be used to be a shining light to a dying world?

When a man wants to marry a woman, what's the first thing he must do before he proposes? Ask for permission from her parents/father. Now in this day and age with many of our Black homes being broken homes, often there isn't a father present to ask. But nonetheless any respectful man should ask a parent for permission to marry their daughter.  Well why is this so important? Becuase you're taking their daughter away from them! She's becoming your wife and you guys are starting your own family. That's not to say that she no longer has ties to her family but that her primary family has changed. At the wedding, why do you think somebody "gives the bride away". Because she's leaving her family to join another family. The man does the same thing, when he's married he's creating his own branch on the family tree. If you subscribe to the idea of the man as the head of household, as I  do, it makes perfect sense that the family should have the man's last name. But here's the problem with that, not enough people believe the man is the head of the household.

There are many reasons I believe this ideology has died. First there's the increase of women in the labor market and the feminist movements of the late 60s and 70s where women were asserting their independence from the traditional wife roles that society had burdened them with. Statistically, this also lead to an increase in divorces and a decline in traditional family structure. I'm not saying feminism is to blame, in fact, I'd argue that men are to blame. If we treated our women right, loved them like we should and fulfilled our roles as head of household, there would probably be a lot less divorce. Within our Black community, many people are growing up in single parent, female-headed households. That's all that a a majority of my generation knows. I grew up in a similar situation (well most of the time i had a two female-headed household but it was a female headed household nonetheless). I'm not saying a female headed household is a bad thing but I do realize that it'd be hard to convince a lot of women to let a man be the head of the household and to submit to their husband if they grew up with a woman running the household.

I've heard many arguments for women not changing their name, some having more weight than others. I've heard things as silly as "I decided when i was 13 I wasn't changing my name, so I don't care if I marry Jesus, I'm not changing my name to Christ" to "My father doesn't have any sons and I don't want my family name to die out"  If the woman of my dreams was concerned about her family name dying out, she could use it as her middle name and I'd be willing to give our children 2 middle names, one of which would be her last name. But, I'm not cool with the hyphenating. Because my name isn't Fuller-Knowles/Dash/insertsomeotherfinewoman'slastnamehere. But if she was the woman of my dreams which Lord willing she will be I'd be willing to compromise if it was REALLY important to her. But in all honesty, I'm not even sure we would get to the marriage convo if she wasn't down to change her last name. I'm not saying it's a red flag, but it's certainly a yellow light! I may be labeled a sexist, chauvinist, or "insert some other derogatory term for a male here".  But these are my beliefs. You don't like it? That's fine, I hadn't planned on marrying your raggedy ass anyway.


9 comments:

  1. well you know how I feel about this... i'd be willing to hyphen but my name is my identity. It's my professional identity and has been my personal one for 23+ years. It just have never sat right with me and no matter how in love I am or how involved with my fiance- it just won't go anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  2. *has


    I would also like to add that I would hate for that to be the end all be all for a relationship that I wouldn't take my boyfriend's name. But like you said- if it's that big of a deal then perhaps we're better off being friends.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brother Fuller:
    Your litany of biblical references does much to support your point about oneness. (I say this without regard to my personal beliefs as well as my challenges to the idea of hyphenated names are in some way indicative of a limited union between two individuals.)

    However, you leave one critical point untouched: Why do you assume that the woman -- and not the man -- should change his name? The verses you cite from genesis say nothing about what would make the man's name more valid than that of his wife. The question then becomes this: what validates the assumption of patrilinearity that you base your premise upon? I look forward to the reply. I only ask that you not use the word "tradition" in your reply...
    JTH

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see where you're coming from with this post, and I think it's totally valid if you and your future bride come into the relationship with the same expectations. Its when you have diff expectations for the end result that a problem arises, but I would guess you should have figured that one out long before you decided to put a ring on it.

    Personally though, changing my name would not be responsible for my career - when I become Dr. Buggs, it wouldn't be prudent to change my name when I will already have published things under Dr. Buggs. While I do harbor wishes to get married BEFORE I become Dr. Buggs (because me and Pops aren't cool like that and I'd love (read: LOVE) to lose this last name before "doctor" goes in front), the likelihood of that happening in the next 3-4 years is real slim.

    Such is life.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @jason to answer your question I'd point to Ephesians chapter 5 (check the post on submission for the full text) where it states that the man is the head of the household. That is the underlying premise for my argument. I'm the head of my household therefore the family should have my last name. I will concede that there is a valid reason for a man taking a woman's last name. Especially considering no matter what the children are coming out of her. Which would give her a more direct tie to the family than the father would have. But again, that ain't me.

    @Buggs

    I feel you, a situation like that I would be cool with my wife not changing her name. Afterall i don't want her feeling like marrying me crushed her dreams of being on cnn or whatever the hell academics aspire to be. But we could also do like candace parker and shelden williams (shelden has won the game of life btw) in which legally her name is Candace Parker Williams but professionally she's Candace Parker.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great post (looks around to see if anyone is actually surprised by this).

    I personally don't understand the need for a woman to keep her last name if she's leaving and cleaving BUT that's is because of my personal beliefs on what marriage is (and is not DC, CT, IA, NH, and VT) but those are my personal beliefs. Some women feel the need to hold on to their name because that is their brand. For me- if you were great and branding yourself under one name-why can't you do the same with a new one? KFC did it...

    Unfortunately I didn't live wit' Jesus 'nem so I dunno who took who's name back then, but to me it just makes sense that when two become one and you believe in the man being the head of the household, then that's the name the FAMILY rolls with. Now I do know that some men take their wives last name...which is a whole 'nother post. I guess to each his or her own. I don't think it's absurd for this issue to be a deal breaker for you. Everyone has their preferences and their deal-breakers...and if they don't-they are lying.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with the premise. I'm not a Christian, but the chances of me marrying someone with a Christian belief system are sizable. I too would like for my wife and children to have my last name. You know I'm not "traditional" by any means, but I simply want my last name to propagate. If women can request the emotional symbolism of a guy proposing to them, I think a last name change would be appropriate.

    However, I support hyphenation IF the lady is established professionally: meaning that she's published or received a Nobel prize or discovered/invented something. You know, stuff that actually requires her name to not change for professional reputation purposes. Not because just calls herself "professional." Umm... yeah... lol

    ReplyDelete
  8. Since I'm getting married in less than 2 weeks and will be accompanying my new bride to the Social Security Office and DMV to get her name changed, let me offer a few thoughts.

    @Jason, I agree with Jeremy that Biblically the man is the head of the household. Changing one's name is the most symbolic gesture of sumbission, the question then becomes, who is submitting? If the woman is going to be the head of the household, then by all means the man should change his last name, but as Jeremy stated Biblically the man is to be the head. The Bible has pretty clearly defined gender roles in the marraige, well more like duties, but these duties would assume in today's society that the woman would change her name.

    @Jurnell, I personally do not support hyphenation at all, except in cases where both the husband and wife hypehnate their names. If a woman wants to hyphenate her name because of her professional accomplishments, than she is putting those before her marraige and family. Anyone can legally change their name by filling out a few simple forms, I'm sure the Nobel Prize committe wouldn't have a problem changing their record books to include the new name of a past winner. On your credit report they have EVERY name you have EVER used be it First-Last, First Middle Inital Last, First Middle Last, any nicknames you have ever used. If there were any professional reason for someone to need to find you, they could. Or if anything she could sign her name: Jane Brown nee Doe (indicating her birth name as Doe).

    I think that not wanting to change your name shows a level of selfishness that would be detrimental to the marraige. Just as I believe signing a pre-nup is a cop out for getting a divorce when times get rough* I think an unwillingness to change your last name shows that you are not 100% fully committed to your marraige and I would just hope it works out for you.
    * I think there are a FEW extreme cases in which a pre-nup is necessry because you could be the "Long-Con" (for all my LOST fans) but thats another debate for another day.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Husband's last name without a question. I think taking your husband´s last name is exciting and like you said represents the complete union of two people. I agree with Shantel's point as I will be in the same situation as well. My medical degree will most likely come before marriage and right now I don't think I would want to change it but that could change.

    ReplyDelete